Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon through the prosecution against the petitioner and his previously mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined with the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, while it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it is actually actually fairly obscure about whether the ninety-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based over the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held into the 90-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed within the bank and considering that only the appellants were posted in the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced on the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it appropriate into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified with the decision of the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Legislation professors traditionally have played a much smaller sized role in building case regulation in common legislation than professors in civil law. Because court decisions in civil regulation traditions are historically brief[4] and not formally amenable to establishing precedent, much of your exposition on the law in civil regulation traditions is done by lecturers fairly than by judges; this is called doctrine and may be published in treatises or in journals such as Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common regulation courts relied very little on read more legal scholarship; As a result, on the turn of your twentieth century, it was pretty rare to check out an educational writer quoted within a legal decision (apart from Potentially with the academic writings of well known judges such as Coke and Blackstone).
six. Mere involvement in a heinous offence isn't any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for your concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, considering the fact that then he is behind the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more required for further investigation, therefore, his ongoing incarceration would not provide any helpful purpose at this stage.
Section 302 from the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject matter to your most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
Please note, Should you be seeking a payment exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Case regulation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation on the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is important for interpreting statutes and predicting legal outcomes. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and advertising transparency.
1. Judicial Independence: The court emphasized the importance of judicial independence along with the separation of powers.
share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property may also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or perhaps to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
Finding reliable free case law sites can be challenging. Lots of websites have to have subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case legislation resources in Pakistan, offering you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.